|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000cam a22000004a 4500 |
| 001 |
b1531355 |
| 003 |
MWH |
| 005 |
20080331013901.0 |
| 008 |
070611s2008 nju b 000 0 eng |
| 010 |
|
|
|a 2007024145
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9780809105809 (alk. paper)
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 0809105802 (alk. paper)
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)144598121
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)144598121
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DLC
|c DLC
|d BAKER
|d BTCTA
|d YDXCP
|d C#P
|d BWX
|
| 043 |
|
|
|a n-us---
|
| 049 |
|
|
|a HCDD
|
| 050 |
0 |
0 |
|a BX1912.9
|b .C34 2008
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Cafardi, Nicholas P.
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Before Dallas :
|b the U.S. Bishops' response to clergy sexual abuse of children /
|c Nicholas P. Cafardi.
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Mahwah, NJ :
|b Paulist Press,
|c 2008.
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a xii, 255 p. ;
|c 24 cm.
|
| 504 |
|
|
|a Includes bibliographical references (p. 233-255).
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a The canonical crime of the sexual abuse of a minor by a cleric : an historical synopsis -- The New Testament -- The fathers -- The early councils -- The middle ages -- The corpus iuris canonici -- Following the corpus -- The eighteenth and nineteenth centuries -- The 1917 code -- Between the codes -- The 1983 code -- The scope of the problem : an historical synopsis -- The Diocese of Lafayette, Louisiana, 1984 -- The Archdiocese of Santa Fe, New Mexico, 1991 -- The Diocese of Fall River, Massachusetts, 1992 -- The Diocese of Dallas, Texas, 1997 -- The Archdiocese of Boston, Massachusetts, 2002 -- The national picture -- The canonical landscape : the failure of the penal system -- A description of the canonical penal process -- The reasons why the canonical process was not used -- A penal process (whether judicial or administrative) was not favored in the law -- The penal process was not adequate to the problem -- American canonists lacked training and expertise in the canonical penal process -- The crimes were covered by prescription -- The canonical penal process would have been useless -- Since the priests mental defects made the ultimate -- Penalty of dismissal from the clerical state unavailable -- The rights of the accused priest, including his appeal rights, would trump the canonical penal process -- The cooperation of the victim could not be counted on and was not sought -- Civil lawyers strongly advised against a canonical -- Penal process because of the discoverability of the acts -- What did the bishops do? -- Early reactions and the manual -- A change in the law -- The prior law -- Suspension ex informata conscientia -- Nonpenal restrictions -- The administrative rescript of laicization -- Requests for changes in the law -- Proposals for a return to the prior law, in new garb -- Proposals for an administrative nonpenal procedure of removal -- The recommendation of the Joint Papal Commission -- Changes in the law proposed by the National Conference of Catholic Bishops -- Changes in the law approved by the Apostolic See -- Continued action by the National Conference of Catholic Bishops -- Statement of General Counsel, February 1988 -- Statement of the Administrative Committee, November 1989 -- Statement of the Office for Media Relations, February 1992 -- Early diocesan policies, 1986-91 -- The Chicago experience, 1991-92 -- The Canadian experience, 1989-92 -- Archbishop Pilarczyk's statement, June 1992 -- The National Conference of Catholic Bishops adoption -- Of the Pilarczyk statement, November 1992 -- The think tank, 1992-93 -- The National Conference of Catholic Bishops' Ad Hoc Committee on Sexual Abuse, June 1993 -- Proposed guidelines on the assessment of clergy and religious for assignment, November 1993 -- The Bernardin accusation and its aftermath -- The Ad Hoc Committee, 1994-96 -- The treatment option -- Canon 1722 and administrative leave -- Canon 1044 and psychic illness -- The treatment centers -- The treatment option -- The relationship between dioceses and treatment centers -- Reassignment after treatment -- Canonical lessons to be learned -- The bishops duty to investigate crimes -- A means to vindicate rights -- Tribunals for the penal process -- The bishops authority in the diocese -- The National Bishops Conferences -- The bishops duty to foster the common good -- Secrecy as a legal value -- The bishops duty to determine assignments -- A necessary change in the law.
|
| 610 |
2 |
0 |
|a Catholic Church
|x Clergy
|x Sexual behavior
|z United States.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Child sexual abuse by clergy
|z United States.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Clergy
|x Sexual behavior.
|
| 856 |
4 |
1 |
|3 Table of contents only
|u http://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip0720/2007024145.html
|t 0
|
| 907 |
|
|
|a .b15313554
|b 10-10-11
|c 03-31-08
|
| 998 |
|
|
|a hd
|b 04-24-08
|c m
|d a
|e -
|f eng
|g nju
|h 0
|i 0
|
| 994 |
|
|
|a C0
|b HCD
|
| 945 |
|
|
|f - -
|g 1
|h 0
|i 38400001013083
|j - -
|k - -
|l hddin
|o -
|p $0.00
|q -
|r -
|s -
|t 0
|u 0
|v 0
|w 0
|x 0
|y .i15828268
|z 04-24-08
|
| 999 |
f |
f |
|i b6849642-be24-57ed-889e-73351d3f26ff
|s 023acf77-6172-540b-a60c-efee158b44af
|t 0
|
| 952 |
f |
f |
|p Can Circulate
|a College of the Holy Cross
|b Main Campus
|c Dinand
|d Dinand Library
|t 0
|e BX1912.9 .C34 2008
|h Library of Congress classification
|i Book
|m 38400001013083
|