|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000nam a22000005i 4500 |
| 001 |
b3216133 |
| 003 |
MWH |
| 005 |
20191023232459.0 |
| 007 |
cr nn 008mamaa |
| 008 |
130702s2002 ne | s |||| 0|eng d |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9789401004763
|
| 024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.1007/978-94-010-0476-3
|2 doi
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-He213)978-94-010-0476-3
|
| 050 |
|
4 |
|a E-Book
|
| 072 |
|
7 |
|a HPL
|2 bicssc
|
| 072 |
|
7 |
|a PHI011000
|2 bisacsh
|
| 072 |
|
7 |
|a QDTL
|2 thema
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Slob, W.
|e author.
|4 aut
|4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Dialogical Rhetoric
|h [electronic resource] :
|b An Essay on Truth and Normativity After Postmodernism /
|c by W. Slob.
|
| 250 |
|
|
|a 1st ed. 2002.
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|a Dordrecht :
|b Springer Netherlands :
|b Imprint: Springer,
|c 2002.
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a IX, 224 p.
|b online resource.
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a computer
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a online resource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 347 |
|
|
|a text file
|b PDF
|2 rda
|
| 490 |
1 |
|
|a Argumentation Library,
|x 1566-7650 ;
|v 7
|
| 490 |
1 |
|
|a Springer eBook Collection
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a 1. Truth; what is the problem? -- 2. A short history of truth and related matters -- 3. From dialogue to rhetoric -- 4. What is wrong with fallacies? -- 5. Holistic incommensurability -- Conclusion -- Endnotes -- References.
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Contemporary developments in philosophy have declared truth as such troublesome, and not merely gaining access to it. In a systematic survey this study investigates what is at stake when truth is given up. A historical overview shows how the current problem of truth came about, and suggests ways to overcome rather than to repair the problem. A key issue resulting from the loss of truth is the lack of normativity. Truth provided an alternative understanding of normativity. Elaborating on the ̀dialectical shift' in logic, a dialogico-rhetorical understanding of normativity is presented. Rather than requiring truth, agreement, or rationality, dialogico-rhetorical normativity is the result of a balance of particular standards. This type of normativity is shaped within discussions - by advancing and accepting arguments - and is not located in sets of predetermined rules. The result is a ̀small' but strong form of normativity. If this understanding of normativity is viable, one of the central problems of contemporary philosophy, the problem of incommensurability, can be seen in a different light. As a result, truth reappears again. Surviving the postmodern criticisms, it is a matter of accountability rather than of description.
|
| 590 |
|
|
|a Loaded electronically.
|
| 590 |
|
|
|a Electronic access restricted to members of the Holy Cross Community.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Logic.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Epistemology.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Modern philosophy.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Religion—Philosophy.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Philosophy.
|
| 690 |
|
|
|a Electronic resources (E-books)
|
| 710 |
2 |
|
|a SpringerLink (Online service)
|
| 773 |
0 |
|
|t Springer eBooks
|
| 830 |
|
0 |
|a Argumentation Library,
|x 1566-7650 ;
|v 7
|
| 830 |
|
0 |
|a Springer eBook Collection.
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://holycross.idm.oclc.org/login?auth=cas&url=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0476-3
|3 Click to view e-book
|t 0
|
| 907 |
|
|
|a .b32161335
|b 04-18-22
|c 02-26-20
|
| 998 |
|
|
|a he
|b 02-26-20
|c m
|d @
|e -
|f eng
|g ne
|h 0
|i 1
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a ZDB-2-SHU
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a ZDB-2-BAE
|
| 950 |
|
|
|a Humanities, Social Sciences and Law (Springer-11648)
|
| 902 |
|
|
|a springer purchased ebooks
|
| 903 |
|
|
|a SEB-COLL
|
| 945 |
|
|
|f - -
|g 1
|h 0
|j - -
|k - -
|l he
|o -
|p $0.00
|q -
|r -
|s b
|t 38
|u 0
|v 0
|w 0
|x 0
|y .i2129298x
|z 02-26-20
|
| 999 |
f |
f |
|i 3074e502-eb31-5a65-85cb-08c46a30347a
|s a6996e1d-b4de-55fe-be18-735d661a95b9
|t 0
|
| 952 |
f |
f |
|p Online
|a College of the Holy Cross
|b Main Campus
|c E-Resources
|d Online
|t 0
|e E-Book
|h Library of Congress classification
|i Elec File
|