Improving Drug Safety — A Joint Responsibility edited by Rolf Dinkel, Bruno Horisberger, Kenneth W. Tolo.

As the focus on pharmaceuticals has broadened from concern for their cost and effectiveness to their real and potential risks and benefits, a critical question has been raised: whose responsibility is it to improve drug safety? In April 1990, this question became the theme for a conference at Wolfsb...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Corporate Author: SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Authors: Dinkel, Rolf (Editor), Horisberger, Bruno (Editor), Tolo, Kenneth W. (Editor)
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer Berlin Heidelberg : Imprint: Springer, 1991.
Edition:1st ed. 1991.
Series:Health Systems Research,
Springer eBook Collection.
Subjects:
Online Access:Click to view e-book
Holy Cross Note:Loaded electronically.
Electronic access restricted to members of the Holy Cross Community.
Table of Contents:
  • I: The Wolfsberg Dialogue
  • 1. From Questions to Missions and Actions
  • 2. The RAD-AR Agenda
  • II: Welcoming Addresses
  • 3. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences
  • 4. International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Associations
  • 5. Intercantonal Office for the Control of Medicines
  • 6. RAD-AR Consortium
  • III: Ethical Perspectives
  • 7. The Discipline of Ethics
  • 8. Ethics and Health
  • 9. A Biomedical Ethical Perspective
  • 10. Corporate Ethics
  • 11. Discussion
  • IV: Generating Knowledge About Drug Risks
  • 12. Categories of Risk and Worldwide Resources
  • 13. International Risk Assessment
  • 14. Resources Needed for Risk Assessment
  • V: Generating Knowledge About Drug Benefits
  • 15. Quality of Life and Health Status: Innovative Outcome Variables for Research in Population Health
  • 16. The Socioeconomic Evaluation of Medicines: A New Dimension
  • 17. Expanding Measures of Benefit in Socioeconomic Studies
  • VI: Assessing the Risk/Benefit Relationship
  • 18. Challenges in Benefit/Risk Appraisal
  • 19. Analysis and Synthesis of Adverse Drug Reaction Evidence
  • 20. The Complexities of Assessment
  • 21. A Review of the Regulatory Process in Japan
  • 22. Postmarketing Surveillance in Japan: An Industry View
  • 23. Distortions in Risk Assessment
  • 24. Weighing Risk/Benefit Assessment: Views of a Swedish “Regulator”
  • 25. Scientific Evaluations and Personal Judgments
  • 26. Discussion
  • VII: Expections in Drug Safety Communication
  • 27. The Challenge of Communicating Drug Safety Information
  • 28. The Media Perspective
  • 29. The Culture of Weighing
  • 30. Patient Package Inserts: Carriers of Consensus Information
  • 31. The Patients’ View
  • 32. Patient Motivation
  • 33. Japans’s Other Drug Market: Exports via Tourists
  • 34. Controlling Drug Safety: Making Cautious Changes
  • 35. Discussion
  • VIII: Experiences in Drug Safety Communication Through Traditional Channels
  • 36. Principles, Experiences, and Desired Actions
  • 37. Physician-Patient Communication and Decision Making
  • 38. Problem-Oriented Drug Information Services
  • IX: Responses Beyond Traditional Communication Channels
  • 39. Manufacturer Standards for Communicating Risks and Benefits
  • 40. Health Behavior Change via Community Education
  • 41. Risk Perception: Analyzing Images and Fears
  • 42. New Channels for the Patients
  • 43. The Patients-in-the-Know Program
  • 44. Information for the Public: A Swedish Example
  • 45. Discussion
  • X: RAD-AR Activities
  • 46. International Overview
  • 47. RAD-AR Council Japan
  • XI: Reports and Recommendations from the Working Groups
  • 48. Generating and Assessing Knowledge
  • 49. Dialogue and Communication
  • XII: Ethical Perspectives Revisited
  • 50. Applying Ethics
  • 51. Moral Common Sense
  • 52. Guiding Principles
  • XIII: An Agenda for Action
  • 53. Future Directions
  • 54. Wolfsberg Think Pieces
  • 55. Bibliography
  • 56. RAD-AR Bibliography
  • 57. Curriculum Vitae of Authors and Editors
  • 58. International Life Sciences Institute
  • 59. International Medical Benefit/Risk Foundation — RAD-AR
  • 60. Subject Index.