Exclusionary Rules in Comparative Law

Exclusionary Rules in Comparative Law edited by Stephen C. Thaman.

This book is a comparative study of the exclusion of illegally gathered evidence in the criminal trial , which includes 15 country studies, a chapter on the European Court of Human Rights, and a comparative synthetic conclusion.  No other book has undertaken such a broad comparative study of exclusi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Corporate Author: SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Authors: Thaman, Stephen C. (Editor)
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer, 2013.
Edition:1st ed. 2013.
Series:Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, 20
Springer eBook Collection.
Subjects:
Private international law.
Conflict of laws.
Criminal law.
Public international law.
Electronic resources (E-books)
Online Access:Click to view e-book
Holy Cross Note:Loaded electronically.
Electronic access restricted to members of the Holy Cross Community.
Table of Contents:
  • Introduction; Stephen C. Thaman
  • Part One: The Vicissitudes of Court-Made Exclusionary Tests: Section One: Common Law Jurisdictions
  • Chapter 1: The United States: The Rise and Fall of the Constitutional Exclusionary Rule; Mark E. Cammack
  • Chapter 2:  Ireland: A Move to Categorical Exclusion?; Arnaud Cras and Yvonne Daly
  • Chapter  3: Scotland: A Plea for Consistency; Fiona Leverick and Findlay Stark
  • Chapter 4:  Israel: The Supreme Court’s New, Cautious Exclusionary Rule; Yuval Merin and Rinat Kitai-Sangero
  • Part One: The Vicissitudes of Court-Made Exclusionary Tests:Section Two: Civil Law Balancing
  • Chapter 5:  Germany: Balancing Truth against Protected Constitutional Interests; Sabine Gless
  • Part Two: From Nullities to Statutory Exclusionary Rules in Continental Europe:  Section One: The Traditional Approach Based on Statutory Nullities
  • Chapter 6:  France: Procedural Nullities and Exclusion; Jean Pradel
  • Part Two: From Nullities to Statutory Exclusionary Rules in Continental Europe: Section Two: From Nullities to Balancing
  • Chapter 7: Belgium: From Categorical Nullities to a Judicially Created Balancing Test; Marie-Aude Beernaert and Philip Traest
  • Chapter 8:  The Netherlands: Statutory Balancing and a Choice of Remedies: Matthias Borgers and Lonneke Stevens
  • Part Two: From Nullities to Statutory Exclusionary Rules in Continental Europe: Section Three:  From Nullities to Statutory Exclusionary Rules
  • Chapter 9:  Spain: The Constitutional Court’s Move From Categorical Exclusion to Limited Balancing; Lorena Bachmaier Winter
  • Chapter 10:  Italy: Statutory Nullities and Non-Usability; Giulio Illuminati.-  Chapter 11:  Greece: From Nullities to Categorical Statutory and Constitutional Exclusionary Rules; George Triantafyllou
  • Chapter 12: Turkey: The Move to Categorical Exclusion of Illegally Gathered Evidence; Adem Sözüer
  • Chapter 13:  Serbia: Courts Struggle With a New Categorical Statutory  Exclusionary Rule; Snežana Brkić
  • Part Three:  The Fair Trial Test for Exclusion
  • Chapter 14: England and Wales: Fair Trial Analysis and the Presumed Admissibility of Physical Evidence; Andrew L-T Choo
  • Chapter  15:  Taiwan: The Codification of a Judicially-Made Discretionary Exclusionary Rule; Jaw-perng Wang
  • Chapter 16: The European Court of Human Rights: The Fair Trial Analysis under Article 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights; Pinar Ölcer
  • Part Four: A Comparison of Exclusionary Jurisprudence
  • Chapter 17: Balancing Truth Against Human Rights: A Comparative Analysis of the Use of Illegally Gathered Evidence in the Criminal Trial; Stephen C. Thaman.-About the contributors
  • index.

Similar Items