Review of CCSP draft synthesis and assessment product 5.3 : decison- support experiments and evaluations using seasonal to interannual forecasts and observational data

Review of CCSP draft synthesis and assessment product 5.3 : decison- support experiments and evaluations using seasonal to interannual forecasts and observational data / Panel to Review CCSP Draft Synthesis and Assessment Product 5.3: Decision-Support Experiments and Evaluations Using Seasonal to Interannual Forecasts and Observational Data ; Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Change, Center for Economic, Governance and International Studies, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council of the National Academies.

This study offered an independent peer review for a synthetic document being produced for the CCSP. It found the draft document to be in a fairly early stage of development and noted several issues needing attention in the revision. The draft was inconsistent across sections with respect to whether...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Corporate Authors: National Research Council (U.S.). Panel to Review CCSP Draft Synthesis and Assessment Product 5.3: Decision-Support Experiments and Evaluations Using Seasonal to Interannual Forecasts and Observational Data., National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Change.
Format: Electronic
Language:English
Published: Washington, D.C. : National Academies Press, ©2008.
Subjects:
Climatology > Research > United States > Evaluation.
Climatic changes > Risk assessment.
Atmospheric carbon dioxide > Environmental aspects.
SCIENCE > Earth Sciences > Meteorology & Climatology.
Atmospheric carbon dioxide > Environmental aspects
Climatic changes > Risk assessment
United States
Online Access:Click for online access
Description
Summary:This study offered an independent peer review for a synthetic document being produced for the CCSP. It found the draft document to be in a fairly early stage of development and noted several issues needing attention in the revision. The draft was inconsistent across sections with respect to whether or not it accepted two assumptions: that more skillful forecasts necessarily have greater value, and that the most useful form of information is a projected future value of an outcome parameter with an uncertainty distribution. Available scientific evidence gives reason to question these assumptions, and the draft did not discuss the evidence. Among other issues needing attention, the review called for the revised draft to do more to substantiate its claims of the potential benefits of knowledge-action networks and to give more careful consideration to the appropriate balance of roles between governmental and private efforts.
Physical Description:1 online resource (ix, 46 pages) : illustrations
Bibliography:Includes bibliographical references (pages 40-42).
ISBN:9780309115698
0309115698

Similar Items