Formulaic language. Volume 2, Acquisition, loss, psychological reality, and functional explanations / edited by Roberta L. Corrigan [and others].

This book is the second of the two-volume collection of papers on formulaic language. The collection is among the first in the field. The authors of the papers in this volume represent a diverse group of international scholars in linguistics and psychology. The language data analyzed come from a var...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Corrigan, Roberta
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Amsterdam ; Philadelphia : John Benjamins, ©2009.
Series:Typological studies in language ; 82.
Subjects:
Online Access:Click for online access
Table of Contents:
  • Formulaic Language
  • Editorial page
  • Title page
  • LCC data
  • Dedication
  • Table of contents
  • Preface
  • Introduction. Approaches to the study of formulae
  • 1. What are formulae?
  • 2. Research questions
  • 3. Synopsis of the book
  • 3.1 Structure and distribution
  • 3.2 Historical change
  • 3.3 Acquisition and loss
  • 3.4 Psychological reality
  • 3.5 Explanations
  • 4. Conclusions
  • References
  • Part I Acquisition and loss
  • Repetition and reuse in child language learning
  • Abstract
  • 1. What is a speech formula and why?
  • 1.1 Repetition and analogy
  • 1.2 Segmentation, data compression and efficiency through redundancy
  • 1.3 Children learn chunks from what they hear
  • 2. Chunks may become analyzed
  • 2.1 Slots provide the basis for developing more general categories
  • 2.2 Productivity and creativity
  • 2.3 The 'traceback' method
  • 2.3.1 Results using the traceback method
  • 3. Experimental evidence for multiword storage
  • 4. Learning chunks and making errors
  • 5. Typological differences
  • 6. Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
  • Formulaic language from a learner perspective
  • Abstract
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Formulaic language - some voices
  • 3. Collocations - general
  • 4. Collocations - some definitions
  • 4.1 Collocations and nativelike selection
  • 4.2 Frequency-based definitions
  • 4.3 The phraseologist's view
  • 4.4 Collocations in Mel'čuk's framework
  • 4.5 The learner in focus
  • 5. An alternative view of collocations
  • 5.1 Psychological, social and cultural aspects of collocations
  • 5.2 The notion of a keyword
  • 5.3 Collocations and fusion of meaning
  • 5.4 Collocations in terms of Lexical Functions
  • 5.4.1 Verbal Lexical Functions
  • 5.4.2 Adjectival Lexical Functions
  • 5.5 Socio-culturally motivated collocations
  • 5.6 Collocations in frames induced by topic.
  • 6. Results of the native speaker/English language learner corpus study
  • 6.1 Aim and procedure
  • 6.2 Hypotheses
  • 6.3 Collocations and 'Free' combinations over the N and NN data
  • 6.4 Attempts by learners
  • 7. Discussion of corpus study results
  • 8. Overall discussion and implications for teaching
  • References
  • The acquisition and development of the topic marker wa in L1 Japanese
  • Abstract
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Method
  • 2.1 Data
  • 2.2 Coding
  • 2.3 Data analysis
  • 3. Results and discussion
  • 3.1 Utterances containing wa
  • 3.2 NP-wa? in mother-child interaction
  • 3.2.1 How the mothers use NP-wa?
  • 3.2.2 How children use NP-wa?
  • 3.3 How the use of NP-wa? affects the overall process of language development
  • 3.3.1 Joint attention and the use of NP-wa?
  • 3.3.2 Development of a sentential structure
  • 4. Conclusion
  • References
  • Formulaic expressions in intermediate EFL writing assessment
  • Abstract
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Methodology
  • 3. Analysis
  • 4. Results
  • 5. Discussion
  • 6. Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • References
  • Connecting the dots to unpack the language
  • Abstract
  • 1. Background and assumptions
  • 2. Evidence of unpacking
  • 3. Forming pragmatic and semantic connections
  • 4. Unpacking directional semantics
  • 5. Unscrambling phonology and morphosyntax: The case of whatta
  • 6. More phonology and morphosyntax: Unpacking didja
  • 7. Conclusions
  • References
  • The effect of awareness-raising on the use of formulaic constructions
  • Abstract
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Acquiring formulaic constructions
  • 3. Research questions
  • 4. Methodology
  • 4.1 Participants
  • 4.2 Materials
  • 4.2.2 Treatment conditions
  • 4.2.3 Target constructions
  • 4.3 Analysis and scoring
  • 4.4 Procedure
  • 5. Results
  • 6. Discussion and conclusion
  • 7. Limitations
  • Appendices
  • Appendix A
  • Appendix B
  • References.
  • Can L2 learners productively use Japanese tense-aspect markers?
  • Abstract
  • 1. Introduction: Rule learning vs. Item learning
  • 2. Inherent aspect and the Japanese tense-aspect markers
  • 3. Method
  • 3.1 Participants
  • 3.2 Materials and procedure
  • 3.2.1 Acceptability judgment test
  • 3.2.2 Procedure
  • 4. Analysis and results
  • 4.1 Lower proficiency learners
  • 4.2 Higher proficiency learners
  • 5. Discussion
  • 5.1 Why is there more verb-specific use for resultative use of -te i-ru?
  • 5.2 Distributional bias: What kind?
  • 5.3 Verb-specific pattern vs. rule-based learning in L2 acquisition of tense-aspect
  • 6. Conclusion
  • Appendix
  • References
  • Formulaic and novel language in a 'dual process' model of language competence
  • Abstract
  • 1.1. Background
  • 2.1. Definitions and description
  • 2.2. How many are there?
  • 2.3. How can we show that people know formulaic expressions?
  • 2.4. Are they processed differently? Neurological localization of automatic speech
  • 2.5. Other speech production studies
  • 3.1. Summary of neurolinguistic studies: The dual process model
  • 3.2. Dual process model and schemata
  • 3.3. Comparison of formulaic expressions with schemata
  • Appendices
  • Appendix I. Some categories of formulaic language with German counterparts.
  • Appendix II. Selected schemata
  • References
  • Part II Psychological reality
  • The psycholinguistic reality of collocation and semantic prosody (2)
  • Abstract
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Experiment: The effects of a verb's semantic prosody on semantic processing
  • 2.1 Method
  • 2.1.1 Participants
  • 2.1.2 Materials
  • 2.2 Procedure
  • 2.3 Results
  • 2.3.1 The relationship between semantic prosody and conceptual meaning
  • 2.3.2 The effect of semantic prosody on affective priming
  • 2.3.3 The effects of conceptual meaning upon affective priming.
  • 2.3.4 Direct comparisons of conceptual meaning and semantic priming
  • 3. Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
  • Frequency and the emergence of prefabs
  • Abstract
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Methods
  • 2.1 Materials
  • 2.2 Subjects and procedure
  • 2.3 Measurement of frequency and duration
  • 3. Results
  • 3.1 p/ as a particle
  • 3.2 Word-internal /^p/
  • 3.3 Summary of the results
  • 4. Discussion
  • 4.1 Theoretical interpretation
  • 4.2 The facilitatory effect of word frequency on phoneme monitoring in word lists
  • 5. Conclusion
  • References
  • Part III Functional explanations
  • Formulaic argumentation in scientific discourse
  • Abstract
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. The abstract as a genre of scientific discourse
  • 3. Formulaic language in the linguistic realization of scientific argumentation
  • 3.1 Four reporting strategies
  • 3.2 Effects produced by the paper construction
  • 4. Formulaic language with paper-like subjects in scientific English: Two corpus studies
  • 4.1 Synchronic study
  • 4.1.1 Corpus information
  • 4.1.2 Reporting across academic disciplines
  • 4.1.3 Formulaic language across the disciplines
  • 4.2 Diachronic study
  • 4.2.1 Corpus information
  • 4.2.2 Reporting constructions in historical scientific English
  • 5. Discussion of results
  • 5.1 Politeness concerns
  • 5.2 Changes in the rhetoric of scientific discourse
  • 6. Conclusion
  • References
  • Accepting responsibility at defendants' sentencing hearings
  • Abstract
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Plan for the paper
  • 3. Background on the right of allocution
  • 4. Data
  • 5. Federal sentencing hearings and "acceptance of responsibility"
  • 6. Formulaic statements of acceptance of responsibility
  • 7. Pros and cons of formulaic statements of acceptance of responsibility
  • 8. Less formulaic statements of acceptance of responsibility.
  • 9. Pros and cons of less formulaic statements of acceptance of reponsibility
  • 10. Conclusions and implications
  • Appendix A
  • References
  • Cases Cited
  • Decorative symmetry in ritual (and everyday) language
  • Abstract
  • 1. Introduction: Galumphing, non-referential bulking and decorative symmetry in Khmer
  • 2. The primacy of phonetic motivation for decorative servant words
  • 2.1 Compounding by conscription
  • 2.2 Compounding by prosthesis
  • 2.3 Compounding via the "Adam's rib" strategy
  • 2.4 Rhyme-swapping
  • 2.5 Recursion: Decorative symmetry run wild
  • 2.5.1 Synonym + Servant word compound
  • 2.5.2 Etymological Doublets + Servant word compound
  • 2.5.3 Synonym + Adam's Rib Compound
  • 3. Non-referential bulking is not pragmatically motivated elsewhere
  • 3.1 Baby talk/doggerel
  • 3.2 Game trash talk
  • 3.3 Aggressive" reduplication
  • 3.4 Agreement
  • 3.5 Structural priming
  • 4. Conclusion
  • 4.1 Style
  • 4.2 Ritualization
  • References
  • Time management formulaic expressions in English and Thai
  • Abstract
  • 0. Introduction
  • 1. Idea/image transfer' and 'time management formulaic expression (TMF)'
  • 2. Time managing formulae in English
  • 2.1 Fillers, hedges and discourse markers in English
  • 2.2 A working definition of time-management formulaic expressions
  • 2.3 Complement-taking predicates and TMF
  • 2.4 Pseudo-cleft and TMF
  • 2.5 An interim summary
  • 3. Time managing formulae in Thai
  • 3.1 Fillers, hedges and discourse markers
  • 3.2 Time-management formula: The /__ nîa/construction
  • 3.3 Challengeable" information and /nîa/
  • 3.4 An interim summary
  • 4. Conclusion
  • References
  • Routinized uses of the first person expression for me in conversational discourse
  • Abstract
  • 1. Introduction to the study
  • 2. Routinized expressions ~ routine functions
  • 3. For me as a first person singular expression.