Description
| Summary: | This paper focuses on the macroeconomic and budgetary impact of tax reforms in a New Keynesian two-country model. Our results show that both income and consumption unilateral tax rate reductions do not constitute a "free lunch", in the sense that they have negative budgetary consequences for the country which implements them. In addition, the degree of self-financing implied by our model is in the 8 1/2 to 24 percent range. Since the degree of self-financing estimated in previous literature was larger, we conclude that in our model not only the "lunch" is not "free", but is also not that "cheap". A comparison of alternative (income-tax versus consumption-tax based) fiscal stimulus packages shows that consumption tax cuts imply a larger short-run impact on domestic output but the income tax cuts stimulate the domestic economy more in the long run. We also look at the implications of a revenue-neutral tax reform in which consumption taxes are increased to compensate for lower income tax collection
|
|---|
| Item Description: | At head of title: IMF Institute.
"September 2008." |
|---|
| Physical Description: | 1 online resource (30 pages) |
|---|
| Format: | Master and use copy. Digital master created according to Benchmark for Faithful Digital Reproductions of Monographs and Serials, Version 1. Digital Library Federation, December 2002. |
|---|
| Bibliography: | Includes bibliographical references (pages 28-30). |
|---|
| Reproduction Note: | Electronic reproduction. |
|---|
| Source of Description, Etc. Note: | Print version record. |
|---|
| Action Note: | digitized |
|---|