|
|
|
|
LEADER |
00000cam a2200000 a 4500 |
001 |
ocn773934129 |
003 |
OCoLC |
005 |
20240909213021.0 |
006 |
m o d |
007 |
cr cnu---unuuu |
008 |
120126s2011 nyu ob 001 0 eng d |
040 |
|
|
|a N$T
|b eng
|e pn
|c N$T
|d CDX
|d VLB
|d UAB
|d E7B
|d YDXCP
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCF
|d OCLCQ
|d EBLCP
|d OCLCQ
|d STBDS
|d OCLCQ
|d FIE
|d NRC
|d U3W
|d YOU
|d TKN
|d AUD
|d OCLCQ
|d HS0
|d OCLCQ
|d UKAHL
|d OCLCO
|d SFB
|d OCLCO
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCO
|d OCLCL
|
020 |
|
|
|a 9780199794683
|q (electronic bk.)
|
020 |
|
|
|a 0199794685
|q (electronic bk.)
|
020 |
|
|
|a 9780199919260
|
020 |
|
|
|a 0199919267
|
020 |
|
|
|z 9780199794539
|
020 |
|
|
|z 0199794537
|
035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)773934129
|
050 |
|
4 |
|a BJ1031
|b .P67 2011eb
|
072 |
|
7 |
|a PHI
|x 030000
|2 bisacsh
|
049 |
|
|
|a HCDD
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Portmore, Douglas W.
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Commonsense consequentialism :
|b wherein morality meets rationality /
|c Douglas W. Portmore.
|
260 |
|
|
|a New York :
|b Oxford University Press,
|c ©2011.
|
300 |
|
|
|a 1 online resource (xx, 266 pages)
|
336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a computer
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a online resource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
490 |
1 |
|
|a Oxford moral theory
|
504 |
|
|
|a Includes bibliographical references (pages 251-257) and index.
|
588 |
0 |
|
|a Print version record.
|
520 |
8 |
|
|a This is a book about morality, rationality, and the interconnections between the two. In it, Portmore defends a version of consequentialism that both comports with our commonsense moral intuitions and shares with consequentialist theories the same compelling teleological conception of practical reasons.
|
505 |
0 |
|
|a Cover; Contents; Acknowledgments; Abbreviations; 1. Why I Am Not a Utilitarian; 1.1 UTILITARIANISM: THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE UGLY; 1.2 THE PLAN FOR THE REST OF THE BOOK; 1.3 MYAIMS; 1.4 OBJECTIVE OUGHTS AND OBJECTIVE REASONS; 1.5 CONVENTIONS THAT I WILL FOLLOW THROUGHOUT THE BOOK; 2. Consequentialism and Moral Rationalism; 2.1 THE TOO-DEMANDING OBJECTION : HOW MORAL RATIONALISM LEADS US TO REJECT UTILITARIANISM; 2.2 THE ARGUMENT AGAINST UTILITARIANISM FROM MORAL RATIONALISM; 2.3 HOW MORAL RATIONALISM COMPELS US TO ACCEPT CONSEQUENTIALISM; 2.4 WHAT IS CONSEQUENTIALISM?
|
505 |
8 |
|
|a 2.5 THE PRESUMPTIVE CASE FOR MORAL RATIONALISM2.6 SOME CONCLUDING REMARKS; 3. The Teleological Conception of Practical Reasons; 3.1 GETTING CLEAR ON WHAT THE VIEW IS; 3.2 CLEARING UP SOME MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT THE VIEW; 3.3 SCANLON'S PUTATIVE COUNTEREXAMPLES TO THE VIEW; 3.4 ARGUMENTS FOR THE VIEW; 4. Consequentializing Commonsense Morality; 4.1 HOW TO CONSEQUENTIALIZE; 4.2 THE DEONTIC EQUIVALENCE THESIS
|
505 |
8 |
|
|a 4.3 BEYOND THE DEONTIC EQUIVALENCE THESIS : HOW CONSEQUENTIALIST THEORIES CAN DO A BETTER JOB OF ACCOUNTING FOR OUR CONSIDERED MORAL CONVICTIONS THAN EVEN SOME NONCONSEQUENTIALIST THEORIES CAN4.4 THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE DEONTIC EQUIVALENCE THESIS; 4.5 AN OBJECTION; 5. Dual-Ranking Act-Consequentialism: Reasons, Morality, and Overridingness ; 5.1 SOME QUICK CLARIFICATIONS; 5.2 MORAL REASONS, OVERRIDINGNESS, AND AGENT-CENTERED OPTIONS; 5.3 MORAL REASONS, OVERRIDINGNESS, AND SUPEREROGATION; 5.4 A META-CRITERION OF RIGHTNESS AND HOW IT LEADS US TO ADOPT DUAL-RANKING ACT-CONSEQUENTIALISM
|
505 |
8 |
|
|a 5.5 NORCROSS'S OBJECTION5.6 SPLAWN'S OBJECTION; 5.7 VIOLATIONS OF THE TRANSITIVITY AND INDEPENDENCE AXIOMS; 6. Imperfect Reasons and Rational Options; 6.1 KAGAN'S OBJECTION: ARE WE SACRIFICING RATIONAL OPTIONS TO GET MORAL OPTIONS?; 6.2 IMPERFECT REASONS AND RATIONAL OPTIONS; 6.3 SECURITISM; 6.4 SECURITISM AND THE BASIC BELIEF; 6.5 SECURITISM'S SUPPOSITIONS AND IMPLICATIONS; 7. Commonsense Consequentialism; 7.1 THE BEST VERSION OF ACT-UTILITARIANISM: COMMONSENSE UTILITARIANISM; 7.2 SECURITIST CONSEQUENTIALISM AND THE ARGUMENT FOR IT
|
505 |
8 |
|
|a 7.3 COMMONSENSE CONSEQUENTIALISM AND HOW IT COMPARES WITH TRADITIONAL ACT-CONSEQUENTIALISM7.4 WHAT HAS BEEN SHOWN AND WHAT REMAINS TO BE SHOWN; Glossary; A; B; C; D; E; G; I; J; K; M; N; O; P; R; S; T; U; V; References; Index; A; B; C; D; E; F; G; H; I; J; K; L; M; N; O; P; Q; R; S; T; U; V; W; Z
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Consequentialism (Ethics)
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Ethics.
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Practical reason.
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a ethics (philosophy)
|2 aat
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a PHILOSOPHY
|x Movements
|x Utilitarianism.
|2 bisacsh
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Consequentialism (Ethics)
|2 fast
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Ethics
|2 fast
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Practical reason
|2 fast
|
758 |
|
|
|i has work:
|a Commonsense consequentialism (Text)
|1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCGX7Hvv8rTBK4pR8YGbt83
|4 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork
|
776 |
0 |
8 |
|i Print version:
|a Portmore, Douglas W.
|t Commonsense consequentialism.
|d New York : Oxford University Press, ©2011
|z 9780199794539
|w (DLC) 2010050743
|w (OCoLC)691927979
|
830 |
|
0 |
|a Oxford moral theory.
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://holycross.idm.oclc.org/login?auth=cas&url=https://academic.oup.com/book/2835
|y Click for online access
|
903 |
|
|
|a OUP-SOEBA
|
994 |
|
|
|a 92
|b HCD
|