|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000cam a2200000Mu 4500 |
| 001 |
ocn804665828 |
| 003 |
OCoLC |
| 005 |
20240909213021.0 |
| 006 |
m o d |
| 007 |
cr un||||||||| |
| 008 |
121120s2012 xx o 000 0 eng d |
| 040 |
|
|
|a EBLCP
|b eng
|e pn
|c EBLCP
|d OCLCO
|d IDEBK
|d OCLCO
|d OCLCQ
|d UKDOC
|d OCLCQ
|d DEBSZ
|d OCLCQ
|d MERUC
|d OCLCQ
|d SNU
|d OCLCO
|d OCLCF
|d OCLCO
|d OCLCQ
|d VI#
|d OCLCO
|d OCLCL
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9781136319129
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 1136319123
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)804665828
|
| 050 |
|
4 |
|a JZ1305 .I5643 2012
|
| 049 |
|
|
|a HCDD
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Schmidt, Brian.
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a International Relations and the First Great Debate /
|c Brian Schmidt.
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Hoboken :
|b Taylor and Francis,
|c 2012.
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 1 online resource (193 pages)
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a computer
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a online resource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 347 |
|
|
|a text file
|2 rdaft
|
| 490 |
1 |
|
|a New International Relations
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a Cover; Title; Copyright Page; Dedication; CONTENTS; CONTRIBUTORS; FOREWORD; SERIES EDITOR'S PREFACE; ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS; 1 INTRODUCTION; 2 THE MYTH THE 'FIRST GREAT DEBATE'; 3 REREADING EARLY TWENTIETH-CENTURY IR THEORY: Idealism revisited; 4 DID THE REALIST-IDEALIST GREAT DEBATE REALLY HAPPEN? A revisionist history of International Relations; 5 C.A.W. MANNING AND THE FIRST GREAT DEBATE; 6 THE AMERICAN NATIONAL INTEREST GREAT DEBATE; 7 MYTH, HALF-TRUTH, REALITY, OR STRATEGY? Managing disciplinary identity and the origins of the first great debate.
|
| 505 |
8 |
|
|a 8 where are we now in the debate about the first great debate?bibliography; index.
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a This book provides an authoritative account of the controversy about the first great debate in the field of International Relations. Of all the self-images of International Relations, none is as pervasive and enduring as the notion that a great debate pitting idealists against realists took place in the 1940s. The story of the first great debate continues to structure the contemporary identity of International Relations, yet in recent years revisionist historians have challenged the conventional wisdom that the field experienced such a debate.
|
| 588 |
0 |
|
|a Print version record.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a International relations
|x Philosophy
|x History
|y 20th century.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Idealism
|x History
|y 20th century.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Realism
|x History
|y 20th century.
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Idealism
|2 fast
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a International relations
|x Philosophy
|2 fast
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Realism
|2 fast
|
| 648 |
|
7 |
|a 1900-1999
|2 fast
|
| 655 |
|
7 |
|a History
|2 fast
|
| 758 |
|
|
|i has work:
|a International relations and the first great debate (Text)
|1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCFYXqywtj4WkwG7TfCtWKq
|4 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork
|
| 776 |
0 |
8 |
|i Print version:
|a Schmidt, Brian.
|t International Relations and the First Great Debate.
|d Hoboken : Taylor and Francis, ©2012
|z 9780415668941
|
| 830 |
|
0 |
|a New international relations.
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/holycrosscollege-ebooks/detail.action?docID=981740
|y Click for online access
|
| 903 |
|
|
|a EBC-AC
|
| 994 |
|
|
|a 92
|b HCD
|