Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions : a Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed Towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion.

Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions : a Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed Towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion.

Speech Acts In Argumentative Discussions: A Theoretical Model For The Analysis Of Discussions Directed Towards Solving Conflicts Of Opinion (Studies ... In Pragmatics And Discourse Analysis (Pda)).

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Eemeren, Frans H. van
Other Authors: Grootendorst, Rob
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Berlin : De Gruyter, 1984.
Series:Studies of argumentation in pragmatics and discourse analysis.
Subjects:
Speech acts (Linguistics)
Debates and debating.
Discussion.
debates.
Debates and debating
Discussion
Online Access:Click for online access
Table of Contents:
  • Chapter 1. The resolution of disputes about expressed opinions
  • 1.1. The aims of this book
  • 1.2. Externalization of argumentation
  • 1.3. Functionalization of argumentation
  • 1.4. Socialization of argumentation
  • 1.5. Dialectification of argumentation
  • Chapter 2. Argumentation as an illocutionary act complex
  • 2.1. The basic theory of speech acts
  • 2.2. Communicative and interactional aspects of language
  • 2.3. Characterization of the speech act of argumentation
  • 2.4. Points of agreement and disagreement with related views
  • 2.5. The illocutionary act complex of argumentation.
  • Chapter 3. Argumentation and the perlocutionary act of convincing
  • 3.1. The perlocutionary act of convincing
  • 3.2. The relation between illocutions and perlocutions
  • 3.3. Various kinds of usage conventions
  • 3.4. The conventionality of the illocutionary perlocution of convincing
  • 3.5. Externalization of the perlocutionary effect of convincing
  • Chapter 4. Argumentation in discussions about expressed opinions
  • 4.1. Problems of analysing argumentative discussions
  • 4.2. Simple single discussions
  • 4.2.1. Standard types of disputes and argumentative discussions.
  • 4.2.2. The resolution of simple single disputes
  • 4.3. The structure of simple single discussions
  • 4.3.1. The stages of the discussion
  • 4.3.2. The structure of the argumentation
  • Chapter 5. The distribution of speech acts in rational discussions
  • 5.1. Expressed opinions, argumentation and assertives
  • 5.2. Illocutionary acts and the resolution of disputes
  • 5.3. The role of speech acts at different stages in the discussion
  • 5.4. The role of usage declaratives
  • 5.5. The interpretation of speech acts
  • Chapter 6. Unexpressed premisses in rational discussions.
  • 6.1. Unexpressed premisses and the co-operative principle
  • 6.2. Shortcomings in current theoretical approaches
  • 6.2.1. The Standard Logical Approach
  • 6.2.2. The Presuppositional Approach
  • 6.3. Unexpressed premisses as conversational implicatures
  • 6.4. The conditions for explicitized unexpressed premisses
  • 6.5. The explicitization of unexpressed premisses
  • Chapter 7. A code of conduct for rational discussants
  • 7.1. A general rule for speech acts in rational discussions
  • 7.2. Rules for the confrontation stage
  • 7.3. Rules for the opening stage.
  • 7.4. Rules for the argumentation stage
  • 7.5. Rule for the concluding stage
  • Chapter 8. Fallacies and the code of conduct for rational discussants
  • 8.1. The treatment of fallacies in the practical literature
  • 8.2. Unexpressed premisses and the analysis of fallacies
  • 8.3. Various sorts of violation of the code of conduct
  • 8.4. The code of conduct and the analysis of fallacies
  • 8.5. Analyses of some fallacies by way of example
  • Notes
  • Bibliography
  • Index of Names
  • Index of Subjects.

Similar Items