Lexical relatedness / Andrew Spencer.

Current approaches to morphology, Andrew Spencer argues, are flawed. He uses intermediate types of lexical relatedness in different languages to develop a morphologically-informed model of the lexical entry. He uses this to build a model of lexical relatedness consistent with paradigm-based models....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Spencer, Andrew, 1953 December 15- (Author)
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2014.
Subjects:
Online Access:Click for online access
Table of Contents:
  • Cover; Contents; Acknowledgements; List of figures; List of tables; List of abbreviations; 1 Introduction: words and paradigms; 1.1 Morphemes and lexemes; 1.2 Words and paradigms; 1.2.1 Lexical relatedness; 1.2.2 Paradigms; 1.3 Overview of the book; 1.4 A note on formalization; Part I. Lexemes, lexical entries, and lexical relatedness; 2 The lexical entry; 2.1 Introduction; 2.2 What is a lexeme?; 2.3 Semantics and syntax; 2.4 Lexemes and the inflection/derivation distinction; 2.5 Non-standard types of lexical representation; 3 Lexical relatedness; 3.1 Types of lexical relatedness
  • 3.2 Canonical inflection vs canonical derivation3.3 Transpositions; 3.4 Meaning and inflection; 3.5 Argument-structure operations; 3.6 Meaningless derivation; 3.7 Evaluative morphology: diminutives and augmentatives; 3.8 Paradigmatically mixed lexical categories; 3.9 Syntagmatic reflexes of mixed categories; 3.10 The nature of lexical relatedness; 3.11 Implications of types of lexical relatedness; Part II. Paradigmatic organization and the lexicon; 4 Paradigm Function Morphology; 4.1 Introduction; 4.2 Brief overview of PFM; 4.3 Affix ordering; 4.4 Rules of referral
  • 4.5 Allomorphy in PFM: morphological metageneralizations4.6 Stems in PFM; 4.7 Derivational morphology in PFM; 4.8 Head marking and the Head-Application Principle; 4.9 Appendix: revised notational conventions for Paradigm Function Morphology; 5 Lexical entries and the generalized paradigm function; 5.1 Introduction; 5.2 Shared information in lexical entries: the role of the lexemic index; 5.3 The generalized paradigm function-a first pass; 5.4 Representing stems; 5.5 Morpholexical properties; 5.6 The generalized paradigm function and the lexical entry
  • 5.7 Affix order, semantic scope, and the GPF5.8 A unified view of lexical relatedness; Part III. The factorized lexicon; 6 Representing lexical relatedness; 6.1 Introduction; 6.2 Formal approaches to lexical relatedness; 6.3 Derivation; 6.4 Canonical inflection and semantic interpretation; 6.5 Transpositions; 6.6 Representing argument structure; 6.7 Argument nominalizations; 6.8 Paradigmatically mixed categories; 6.9 Evaluative morphology; 6.10 Meaningless derivation; 6.11 Implications of intermediate types for a model of lexical relatedness
  • 7 The form and function of argument-structure representations7.1 Introduction; 7.2 Justifying argument structure; 7.3 Semantics and syntax; 7.4 Argument-structure alternations mediated by conversion; 7.5 Conclusions; 8 Nominalizations; 8.1 Introduction; 8.2 Action nominalizations as syntactically mixed categories; 8.3 Approaches to categorial mixing; 8.4 The semantics of nominalizations; 8.5 Analysis of deverbal nominalizations; 8.6 Nominalized adjectives; 8.7 The interpretation of nominalizations: summary; 8.8 Defining nominalizations; 8.9 Summary; 9 Further instances of transposition