The evidential basis of linguistic argumentation / edited by András Kertész, University of Debrecen ; Csilla Rákosi, MTA-DE Research Group for Theoretical Linguistics, Debrecen.

This chapter provides a survey about the most frequent methods of inconsistency resolution in Optimality Theory. With the help of the p-model, inconsistencies in OT are divided into two main groups. The first group includes conflicts that are deemed to be fatal and are solved usually by the modifica...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Kertész, András (Editor), Rákosi, Csilla (Editor)
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Amsterdam : John Benjamins Publishing Company, [2014]
Series:Studies in language companion series ; vol. 153.
Subjects:
Online Access:Click for online access
Description
Summary:This chapter provides a survey about the most frequent methods of inconsistency resolution in Optimality Theory. With the help of the p-model, inconsistencies in OT are divided into two main groups. The first group includes conflicts that are deemed to be fatal and are solved usually by the modification of the theory: namely, clashes between "linguistic data" (acceptability judgements) and applications of the model (results of the evaluation procedure). The second group consists of conflicts that are, in contrast, tolerable in the view of OT theorists: inconsistencies between constraints and t
Physical Description:1 online resource (page cm)
Bibliography:Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN:9789027270559
9027270554
ISSN:0165-7763 ;
Language:English.
Source of Description, Etc. Note:Print version record.