|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000cam a2200000 i 4500 |
| 001 |
ocn875582440 |
| 003 |
OCoLC |
| 005 |
20241006213017.0 |
| 006 |
m o d |
| 007 |
cr cnu---unuuu |
| 008 |
140403s2014 enk ob 001 0 eng d |
| 040 |
|
|
|a N$T
|b eng
|e rda
|e pn
|c N$T
|d E7B
|d YDXCP
|d OCLCF
|d VLB
|d NLGGC
|d EBLCP
|d STBDS
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCO
|d FIE
|d BUF
|d OCLCQ
|d CEF
|d OCLCA
|d REC
|d U3W
|d WYU
|d YOU
|d OCLCQ
|d K6U
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCO
|d OCLCQ
|d SFB
|d OCLCQ
|d QGK
|d OCLCO
|
| 019 |
|
|
|a 1259229996
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9780191502477
|q (electronic bk.)
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 0191502472
|q (electronic bk.)
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9780191760969
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 019176096X
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 0198822642
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9780198822646
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)875582440
|z (OCoLC)1259229996
|
| 050 |
|
4 |
|a B187.K7
|
| 072 |
|
7 |
|a PHI
|x 002000
|2 bisacsh
|
| 049 |
|
|
|a HCDD
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Fine, Gail,
|e author.
|
| 245 |
1 |
4 |
|a The possibility of inquiry :
|b Meno's Paradox from Socrates to Sextus /
|c Gail Fine.
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|a Oxford :
|b Oxford University Press,
|c 2014.
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 1 online resource
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a computer
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a online resource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 588 |
0 |
|
|a PDF title page (viewed April 3, 2014).
|
| 504 |
|
|
|a Includes bibliographical references and index.
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Meno's Paradox, which is first formulated in Plato's Meno, challenges the very possibility of inquiry. Plato replies with the theory of recollection, according to which we all had prenatal knowledge of some range of things, and what we call inquiry involves recollecting what we previously knew; he also illustrates this with his famous cross-examination of an untutored slave about a geometry problem, whose solution the slave is able to discover through inquiry. Hence, contrary to the paradox, inquiry is possible after all. Plato is not the only philosopher to grapple with Meno's Paradox: so too do Aristotle, the Epicureans, the Stoics, and Sextus. How do their various replies compare with one another, and with Plato's? How good are any of their replies? In a fascinating fragment preserved in Damascius' Commentary on the Phaedo, Plutarch briefly considers these questions (though for obvious chronological reasons he doesn't discuss Sextus).
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a Plato's Meno. The origins of the problem ; Meno's questions and Socrates' dilemma ; Socrates' three-stage reply : the first and second stages ; The third stage : the second statement of the theory of recollection -- Aristotle and after. Aristotelian inquiry ; Epicurean inquiry ; Stoic inquiry ; Plutarch's account ; Skeptical inquiry 1 : Sextus and the Stoics ; Skeptical inquiry 2 : Sextus and the Epicureans.
|
| 546 |
|
|
|a English.
|
| 600 |
0 |
0 |
|a Plato.
|
| 600 |
0 |
7 |
|a Plato
|2 fast
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Inquiry (Theory of knowledge)
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Philosophy, Ancient.
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a PHILOSOPHY
|x History & Surveys
|x Ancient & Classical.
|2 bisacsh
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Inquiry (Theory of knowledge)
|2 fast
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Philosophy, Ancient
|2 fast
|
| 776 |
0 |
8 |
|i Print version :
|z 9780199577392
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://holycross.idm.oclc.org/login?auth=cas&url=https://academic.oup.com/book/8232
|y Click for online access
|
| 903 |
|
|
|a OUP-SOEBA
|
| 994 |
|
|
|a 92
|b HCD
|