Argumentation and health / edited by Sara Rubinelli, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans.

This chapter is concerned with the reasons why sometimes good arguments in health communication leaflets fail to convince the targeted audience. As an illustrative example it uses the age-dependent eligibility of women in the Netherlands to receive routine breast cancer screening examinations: accor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Rubinelli, Sara, Snoeck Henkemans, Arnolda Francisca
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Amsterdam : John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2014.
Series:Benjamins current topics ; Volume 64.
Subjects:
Online Access:Click for online access

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000 a 4500
001 ocn883374031
003 OCoLC
005 20240623213015.0
006 m o d
007 cr cnu---unuuu
008 140711s2014 ne ob 001 0 eng d
040 |a IDEBK  |b eng  |e pn  |c IDEBK  |d EBLCP  |d MHW  |d YDXCP  |d OCLCO  |d N$T  |d CDX  |d DEBSZ  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCF  |d E7B  |d OCLCQ  |d CCO  |d MERUC  |d DXU  |d LOA  |d AGLDB  |d K6U  |d STF  |d PIFAG  |d FVL  |d VGM  |d ZCU  |d OCLCQ  |d COO  |d U3W  |d OCLCQ  |d VTS  |d ICG  |d VT2  |d AU@  |d REC  |d OCLCQ  |d WYU  |d TKN  |d DKC  |d OCLCQ  |d M8D  |d UKAHL  |d OCLCQ  |d AJS  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCL  |d SXB 
019 |a 889303347  |a 1055364242  |a 1066648059  |a 1081212111  |a 1228619630 
020 |a 9789027269843  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 902726984X  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 1306942691  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 9781306942690  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 9027242526 
020 |a 9789027242525 
020 |z 9789027242525 
035 |a (OCoLC)883374031  |z (OCoLC)889303347  |z (OCoLC)1055364242  |z (OCoLC)1066648059  |z (OCoLC)1081212111  |z (OCoLC)1228619630 
050 4 |a PN4192.M43  |b A74 2014 
072 7 |a HEA  |x 012000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a HEA  |x 020000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a MED  |x 004000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a MED  |x 101000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a MED  |x 109000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a MED  |x 029000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a MED  |x 040000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a MED  |x 092000  |2 bisacsh 
049 |a HCDD 
245 0 0 |a Argumentation and health /  |c edited by Sara Rubinelli, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans. 
260 |a Amsterdam :  |b John Benjamins Publishing Company,  |c 2014. 
300 |a 1 online resource (vi, 147 pages) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Benjamins Current Topics ;  |v Volume 64 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references and index. 
588 0 |a Print version record. 
520 |a This chapter is concerned with the reasons why sometimes good arguments in health communication leaflets fail to convince the targeted audience. As an illustrative example it uses the age-dependent eligibility of women in the Netherlands to receive routine breast cancer screening examinations: according to Dutch regulations women under 50 are ineligible for them. The present qualitative study rests on and complements three experimental studies on the persuasiveness of mammography information leaflets; it uses interviews to elucidate reasons why the arguments in the health communication leaflet. 
505 0 |a Argumentation and Health; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Argumentation in the healthcare domain; Argumentation and informed consent in the doctor-patient relationship; Introduction; Reibl v. Hughes; The law and bioethics of informed consent; The asymmetry of the doctor-patient relationship; Preserving the balance of SDM in the informed consent interaction; The circularity of 'competent to consent'; References; Institutional constraints on strategic maneuvering in shared medical decision-making; 1. Shared decision making. 
505 8 |a 2. Comparison of the ideal of shared decision making with the concept of critical discussion3. Strategic maneuvering in the physician's presentation of treatments; 3.1 Presenting the recommendation in such a way that the patient seems to participate in the decision making process about the best treatment; 3.2 Presenting the available treatment options in such a way that the treatment preferred by the doctor seems to be the most reasonable option; 3.3 Presenting the recommendation in such a way that it looks as if the decision is completely up to the patient; 4. Conclusion; References. 
505 8 |a Reasonableness of a doctor's argument by authority1. Introduction; 2. Argumentation in medical consultation; 3. Authority argumentation; 4. Soundness of a doctor's argument by authority; General soundness conditions; Specific soundness conditions; 5. Conclusion; References; Evaluating argumentative moves in medical consultations; 1. The social context of the medical consultation in Italy; 1.1 The Rigotti and Rocci model for the description of the communication context; 1.2 The institutionalized dimension of the medical consultation in Italy. 
505 8 |a 2. Evaluating argumentation in medical consultationsExtract #1; Extract #2; Extract #3; 3. Concluding remarks; References; Teaching argumentation theory to doctors; 1. Introduction; 2. The 2012 medical consultation; 2.1 Patient-centeredness as a philosophy; 2.2 Shared decision-making as a model; 2.3 Informed consent as a process; 3. What does not work, what works, what is needed; 4. Conclusion; References; Direct-to-consumer advertisements for prescription drugs as an argumentative activity type; 1. Introduction; 2. Intrinsic and extrinsic constraints on argumentative discourse. 
505 8 |a 3. Direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertisements4. DTCA as an argumentative activity type; 5. Example: Nexium advertisement; 6. Conclusion; References; The strategic function of variants of pragmatic argumentation in health brochures; 1. Introduction; 2. A pragma-dialectical approach to pragmatic argumentation; 3. Dialectical options in the argumentation stage; 4. Choosing pragmatic argumentation to address doubt towards the standpoint; 4.1 Dialectical relevance of choosing pragmatic argumentation; 4.2 Rhetorical advantage of choosing pragmatic argumentation. 
650 0 |a Communication in medicine. 
650 0 |a Medical personnel. 
650 0 |a Communication in human services. 
650 0 |a Interprofessional relations. 
650 0 |a Debates and debating. 
650 7 |a debates.  |2 aat 
650 7 |a HEALTH & FITNESS  |x Holism.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a HEALTH & FITNESS  |x Reference.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a MEDICAL  |x Alternative Medicine.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a MEDICAL  |x Atlases.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a MEDICAL  |x Essays.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a MEDICAL  |x Family & General Practice.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a MEDICAL  |x Holistic Medicine.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a MEDICAL  |x Osteopathy.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a Communication in human services  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Communication in medicine  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Debates and debating  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Interprofessional relations  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Medical personnel  |2 fast 
700 1 |a Rubinelli, Sara. 
700 1 |a Snoeck Henkemans, Arnolda Francisca. 
758 |i has work:  |a Argumentation and health (Text)  |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCFPJrw9Qtf6yCBRfBccJj3  |4 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |a Rubinelli, Sara.  |t Argumentation and Health.  |d John Benjamins Publishing Company 2014  |z 9789027242525 
830 0 |a Benjamins current topics ;  |v Volume 64. 
856 4 0 |u https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/holycrosscollege-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1730199  |y Click for online access 
903 |a EBC-AC 
994 |a 92  |b HCD