|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000cam a2200000Mu 4500 |
| 001 |
on1076803594 |
| 003 |
OCoLC |
| 005 |
20241006213017.0 |
| 006 |
m o d |
| 007 |
cr |n|---||||| |
| 008 |
181201s2018 enk o 000 0 eng d |
| 040 |
|
|
|a EBLCP
|b eng
|e pn
|c EBLCP
|d STBDS
|d YOU
|d OCLCO
|d OCLCF
|d BRX
|d OCLCQ
|d K6U
|d OCLCO
|d OCLCQ
|d MVS
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCO
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9780192526823
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 0192526820
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)1076803594
|
| 050 |
|
4 |
|a PC47
|
| 049 |
|
|
|a HCDD
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Wolfe, Sam.
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Verb Second in Medieval Romance
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Oxford :
|b Oxford University Press USA - OSO,
|c 2018.
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 1 online resource (209 pages)
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a computer
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a online resource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 490 |
1 |
|
|a Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics Ser. ;
|v v. 34
|
| 588 |
0 |
|
|a Print version record.
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a Cover; Verb Second in Medieval Romance; Copyright; Contents; Series preface; Acknowledgements; List of abbreviations; Source Texts; 1: Introduction; 1.1 Medieval Romance word order and the V2 hypothesis; 1.2 Germanic Verb Second: Theoretical and empirical developments; 1.3 The Medieval Romance `problem;́ 1.3.1 V2 languages?; 1.3.2 Continuity or microvariation?; 1.3.3 V2 and its correlates; 1.3.4 V2 and diachrony; 1.4 Materials and methods; 2: The V2 syntax of Medieval Romance; 2.1 Introduction; 2.2 Arguments for and against a V2 analysis; 2.2.1 The V2 hypothesis: Arguments and evidence
|
| 505 |
8 |
|
|a 2.2.2 Evidence against V2?2.3 Evaluating the claims; 2.3.1 The preverbal field and inversion phenomena; 2.3.2 Matrix/embedded asymmetries; 2.3.3 V1 and V3 `violations;́ 2.3.4 Diachronic implausibility?; 3: Old Italo-Romance; 3.1 Introduction; 3.2 Matrix clause syntax; 3.2.1 Verb placement; 3.2.2 The preverbal field and clitic placement; 3.2.3 Subject positions; 3.2.4 Verb First and Verb Third; 3.3 Embedded clause syntax; 3.3.1 Verb placement and SVO; 3.3.2 Embedded main clause phenomena; 3.4 Chaptersummary; 4: Old Gallo-Romance; 4.1 Introduction; 4.2 Matrix clause syntax; 4.2.1 Verb placement
|
| 505 |
8 |
|
|a 4.2.2 The preverbal field and clitic placement4.2.3 Subject positions; 4.2.4 Verb First and Verb Third; 4.3 Embedded clause syntax; 4.3.1 Verb placement and SVO; 4.3.2 Embedded main clause phenomena; 4.4 Chaptersummary; 5: Old Spanish; 5.1 Introduction; 5.2 Matrix clause syntax; 5.2.1 Verb placement; 5.2.2 The preverbal field and clitic placement; 5.2.3 Subject positions; 5.2.4 Verb First and Verb Third; 5.3 Embedded clause syntax; 5.3.1 Verb placement and SVO; 5.3.2 Embedded main clause phenomena; 5.3.3 A symmetrical V2 language?; 5.4 Chaptersummary; 6: Old Sardinian; 6.1 Introduction
|
| 505 |
8 |
|
|a 6.2 Matrix clause syntax6.2.1 Verb placement; 6.2.2 The preverbal field and clitic placement; 6.2.3 One half of the V2 constraint?; 6.2.4 Subject positions; 6.2.5 Verb Third; 6.3 Embedded clause syntax; 6.3.1 Embedded word order in Wolfe (2015c); 6.3.2 New data on Old Sardinian embedded clauses; 6.4 Chaptersummary; 7: Rethinking Medieval Romance V2; 7.1 The syntax of Medieval Romance; 7.1.1 Summary; 7.1.2 Commonalities and the V2 bottleneck; 7.1.3 Fin- and Force-V2 and microvariation; 7.1.3.1 Verb Third.; 7.1.3.2 Verb First; 7.1.3.3 The syntax of si; 7.1.3.4 Matrix/embedded asymmetries
|
| 505 |
8 |
|
|a 7.1.3.5 A note on the V2 correlates7.1.4 The cartography of the clause; 7.2 Changes in clausal structure; 7.2.1 Common syntactic properties: Early Medieval Romance; 7.2.2 The Later Medieval Romance split; 7.2.3 From Fin- to Force-V2; 7.2.4 Old Sardinian and the great leap from Latin to Romance; 7.3 Summary; 8: Conclusion; 8.1 Summary of major findings; 8.2 New perspectives on the Medieval Romance `problem;́ 8.3 Future research; References; Primary texts and sources; Bibliography; Index
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a This volume provides the first book-length study of the controversial topic of Verb Second and related properties in a range of Medieval Romance varieties. The findings have widespread implications for the understanding of both the key typological property of Verb Second and the development of Latin into the modern Romance languages.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Romance languages
|x History.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Romance languages
|x Syntax.
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Romance languages
|2 fast
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Romance languages
|x Syntax
|2 fast
|
| 655 |
|
7 |
|a History
|2 fast
|
| 776 |
0 |
8 |
|i Print version:
|a Wolfe, Sam.
|t Verb Second in Medieval Romance.
|d Oxford : Oxford University Press USA - OSO, ©2018
|z 9780198804673
|
| 830 |
|
0 |
|a Oxford studies in diachronic and historical linguistics.
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://holycross.idm.oclc.org/login?auth=cas&url=https://academic.oup.com/book/26795
|y Click for online access
|
| 903 |
|
|
|a OUP-SOEBA
|
| 994 |
|
|
|a 92
|b HCD
|