Morality by degrees : reasons without demands / Alastair Norcross.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Norcross, Alastair (Author)
Format: eBook
Published: Oxford ; New York : Oxford University Press, 2020.
Online Access:Click for online access


LEADER 00000cam a2200000 i 4500
001 on1144915985
003 OCoLC
005 20240504213016.0
006 m o d
007 cr |n|||||||||
008 200317s2020 enk ob 001 0 eng d
040 |a YDX  |b eng  |e rda  |e pn  |c YDX  |d N$T  |d EBLCP  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCF  |d KUK  |d STBDS  |d OH1  |d QGJ  |d UKAHL  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d SFB  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCL 
019 |a 1145583771 
020 |a 9780192583598  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 019258359X  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 9780192583604 
020 |a 0192583603 
020 |z 0198844999 
020 |z 9780198844990 
035 |a (OCoLC)1144915985  |z (OCoLC)1145583771 
050 4 |a BJ1012  |b .N67 2020 
049 |a HCDD 
100 1 |a Norcross, Alastair,  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Morality by degrees :  |b reasons without demands /  |c Alastair Norcross. 
264 1 |a Oxford ;  |a New York :  |b Oxford University Press,  |c 2020. 
300 |a 1 online resource (vii, 157 pages) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In Morality by Degrees, Alastair Norcross articulates and defends a radical new approach to ethical theory. Consequentialist theories of the right connect the rightness and wrongness (and related notions) of actions with the intrinsic goodness and badness of states of affairs consequential on those actions. The most popular such theory is maximization, which is said to demand of agents that they maximize the good, that they do the best they can, at all times. Thus it may seem that consequentialist theories are overly demanding, and, relatedly, that they cannot accommodate the phenomenon of going above and beyond the demands of duty. However, a clear understanding of consequentialism leaves no room for a theory of the right, at least not at the fundamental level of the theory. A consequentialist theory, such as utilitarianism, is a theory of how to rank outcomes, and derivatively actions, which provides reasons for choosing some actions over others. It is thus a purely scalar theory, with no demands that certain actions be performed, and no fundamental classification of actions as right or wrong. However, such notions may have pragmatic benefits at the level of pplication, since many people find it easier to guide their conduct by simple commands, rather than to think in terms of reasons of varying strength to do one thing rather than another. A contextualist semantics for various terms, such as "right", "permissible", "harm", when combined with the scalar approach to consequentialism, allows for the expression of truth-apt propositions with sentences containing such terms 
650 0 |a Ethics. 
650 0 |a Conduct of life. 
650 0 |a Values. 
650 7 |a ethics (philosophy)  |2 aat 
650 7 |a ethics (philosophical concept)  |2 aat 
650 7 |a Values  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Conduct of life  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Ethics  |2 fast 
758 |i has work:  |a Morality by degrees (Text)  |1  |4 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |z 0198844999  |z 9780198844990  |w (OCoLC)1121084058 
856 4 0 |u  |y Click for online access 
903 |a OUP-SOEBA 
994 |a 92  |b HCD