|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000cam a2200000Mi 4500 |
| 001 |
on1321044995 |
| 003 |
OCoLC |
| 005 |
20240909213021.0 |
| 006 |
m o d |
| 007 |
cr ||||||||||| |
| 008 |
210210t20222022nyu fob 001 0 eng d |
| 040 |
|
|
|a STBDS
|b eng
|e rda
|e pn
|c STBDS
|d OCLCF
|d OCLCQ
|d OCLCO
|d OCLCL
|d EBLCP
|d OH1
|d QGK
|
| 019 |
|
|
|a 1312162730
|a 1443957896
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9780199366774
|q (ebook)
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 0199366772
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9780190662769
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 019066276X
|
| 020 |
|
|
|z 9780199941476
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)1321044995
|z (OCoLC)1312162730
|z (OCoLC)1443957896
|
| 050 |
|
4 |
|a K5036
|b .G35 2022
|
| 049 |
|
|
|a HCDD
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Gallant, Kenneth S.,
|d 1951-
|e author.
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a International criminal jurisdiction :
|b whose law must we obey? /
|c Kenneth S. Gallant.
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|a New York, NY :
|b Oxford University Press,
|c [2022]
|
| 264 |
|
4 |
|c ©2022
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 1 online resource (xxxii, 775 pages)
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a text
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a computer
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a online resource
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Also issued in print: 2022.
|
| 504 |
|
|
|a Includes bibliographical references and index.
|
| 520 |
8 |
|
|a 'International Criminal Jurisdiction' is a treatise for anyone conducting research into how domestic and international regimes create and enforce rules for personal and subject matter jurisdiction in transnational or international criminal cases.
|
| 521 |
|
|
|a Specialized.
|
| 588 |
|
|
|a Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (viewed on April 6, 2022).
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a Cover -- International Criminal Jurisdiction -- Copyright -- Dedication -- Summary Table of Contents -- Detailed Table of Contents -- Acknowledgments -- Abbreviations -- Part One The Question and Its Context -- 1. The Question of Jurisdiction -- 1.I Some Meanings of the Question -- 1.I.A Legal Obligation and the Meaning of "Must" -- 1.I.B Jurisdiction and Authority -- 1.II A Concept of Law -- 1.II.A A Few Words on Criminal Law -- 1.II.B A Few Words on International Law -- 1.II.C Law in a World of Multiple Legal Systems -- 1.III Jurisdiction and Its Three Aspects -- 1.III.A Legislative Jurisdiction (Jurisdiction to Prescribe) -- 1.III.A.1 Jurisdiction to prescribe "true" international criminal law and treaty crimes -- 1.III.B Adjudicative Jurisdiction -- 1.III.C Jurisdiction to Enforce -- 1.III.D The Primacy of Prescriptive Jurisdiction -- 1.III.E Bringing in Adjudication: "Answerability" of Persons to States -- 1.III.F Schools of Thought: "Criminalist" and "Internationalist" -- 1.III.F.1 Values underlying public international law and criminal law -- 1.III.F.2 "Criminalists," "internationalists," and private international lawyers -- 1.III.F.3 International law and criminal law: A changing balance of influence -- 1.III.G Conflicts of Jurisdiction -- 1.III.H The Regulatory State and Authority to Make (Mostly) Non-Criminal Law -- 1.III.I Jurisdiction over Persons and Their Acts Does Not Exhaust State Power -- 1.IV National Law of Criminal Jurisdiction from the Viewpoints of States and of Actors -- 1.V The Question of Jurisdiction as Public International Law -- 1.V.A The Dominant Perspective: Jurisdiction as Public International Law -- 1.V.B Posing the International Law Issues of Jurisdiction, from the Point of View of Persons Affected -- 1.VI Why the Question "Whose Law Must We Obey?" Persists.
|
| 505 |
8 |
|
|a 1.VII Comparative Law of Jurisdiction: Importance, Classification, Problems -- 1.VII.A Classification of Legal Systems -- 1.VII.A.1 Common law system -- 1.VII.A.2 Civil law system -- 1.VII.A.3 Islamic law states -- 1.VII.A.4 "Other Asian legal systems" -- 1.VII.A.5 The problem of legal imperialism -- 1.VII.B Biases and Limitations of Language and Materials in this Book -- 1.VII.B.1 Limitations of comparative research in this book -- I.VII.B.2 Transliteration and other spelling problems -- 1.VIII The Theses of this Book -- 1.IX The Plan of this Book -- 1.IX.A Why Is this Book so Long? -- 2. The National and International Law of Criminal Jurisdiction: Structure and Sources -- 2.I Introduction to the National Sources -- 2.I.A Foreign Law Used in Domestic Criminal Cases -- 2.I.B Non-National Sources of Criminal Law? The Case of Islamic Law -- 2.I.B.1 Statutes, sharī'a, and applicability of criminal law -- 2.II How Does International Law Affect State Authority to Define the Ambit of Criminal Laws and Adjudicative Jurisdiction of Courts? The Lotus Framework -- 2.III The Place of the Individual in the International Law of Jurisdiction -- 2.III.A "Diplomatic Protection" by One's State of Nationality -- 2.III.B The Individual in International Law -- 2.III.B.1 The problem of legal obligation -- 2.III.C Law and/or Politics? Court Process for Persons versus Legal/Political Interaction between States -- 2.III.D Individual or State: Whose Claim? Whose Remedy? -- 2.III.E Application of International Law in National Courts: Monism, Dualism, and Their Variants -- 2.III.E.1 Interpreting domestic statutes to achieve compliance with international law -- 2.III.F Direct Participation of Individuals in International Legal Processes: Human Rights Treaty Courts and International Criminal Courts -- 2.III.G Extradition and Protections from Jurisdictional Claims.
|
| 505 |
8 |
|
|a 2.III.H Summary and a Statement of the Ideal -- 2.IV Sources of International Law and Their Application to the Law of Jurisdiction -- 2.IV.A International Conventions -- 2.IV.A.1 Treaties and jurisdiction to prescribe for "core" international criminal law -- 2.IV.A.2 Treaties and the "Whose law . . .?" questions -- 2.IV.B Customary International Law -- 2.IV.B.1 The two elements -- 2.IV.B.2 A"general practice" (the first element) -- 2.IV.B.3 "Accepted as law" (opinio juris-the second element) -- 2.IV.B.3.a Opinio juris, "instant custom," and "Grotian moments" -- 2.IV.B.4 National legislation and decisions of national courts as practice and expressions of opinio juris -- 2.IV.B.4.a Use as forms of state practice -- 2.IV.B.4.b Expression of opinio juris by national legislation and court decisions -- 2.IV.B.5 Traditional interstate practice as evidence of a customary law of jurisdiction -- 2.IV.B.6 Treaties and formation of customary international law of jurisdiction -- 2.IV.B.7 Acts of international organizations -- 2.IV.B.7.a Decisions of international courts and tribunals -- 2.IV.B.8 But what about the "auxiliary" or "subsidiary" status of judicial decisions in the ICJ Statute? -- 2.IV.B.9 What about the teachings of publicists and their auxiliary or subsidiary status? -- 2.IV.C General Principles of Law -- 2.IV.C.1 So what do general principles of law do? -- 2.IV.C.2 Using general principles to construct the law of jurisdiction -- 2.IV.C.3 General principles as a source of the law of modern international crimes -- 2.IV.C.4 An objection: Have we gone beyond true general principles? -- 2.IV.C.5 General principles and legality -- Part Two International and Comparative Criminal Jurisdiction: The Standard Model -- 3. The Standard Model of Criminal Jurisdiction: Introduction and General Issues.
|
| 505 |
8 |
|
|a 3.I Introduction to the Model and Its Principles -- 3.I.A The Five Principles -- 3.I.B The Need for a "Significant Connection" between the Persons or Events Regulated and the Regulating State -- 3.II Jurisdiction of Courts and Ambit of Criminal Laws -- 3.III Roots of the Standard Model -- 3.IV The Standard Model as a Modern Intellectual and Legal Construct -- 3.V Relationship of Jurisdiction to Prescribe and to Adjudicate -- 3.V.A The Starting Point: Identity of Jurisdiction to Prescribe and Adjudicate in Criminal Law -- 3.V.B Subsidiarity: Where States Define Crimes but Sometimes Refuse Adjudicative Jurisdiction -- 3.V.C Adjudication in Absentia -- 3.V.D Foreign Law in Domestic Criminal Cases -- 3.V.E Jurisdiction to Adjudicate and Sources of Substantive Law in International Criminal Courts and Tribunals -- 3.V.F Criminal Jurisdiction and Non-Criminal Choice of Law -- 3.VI "Primary" versus "Subsidiary" Adjudicative Jurisdiction -- and the Need for "Double Criminality" and "Lex Mitior [Lesser Penalty]" -- 3.VI.A Does International Law Require Subsidiarity? -- 3.VI.B Ryngaert: Prescriptive Subsidiarity -- 3.VII Problems of Jurisdiction to Enforce -- 3.VIII Jurisdiction as Substantive or Procedural Law -- 3.IX "Jurisdictional" and "Material" Facts -- 3.X Special Jurisdictional Problems: Law of the Sea and Air, Law of Armed Forces, Artificial Persons, and Law of Immunity -- 3.X.A Laws of the Sea and Air -- 3.X.B Law of Armed Forces -- 3.X.C Artificial or Juridical Persons -- 3.X.D Diplomatic and Other Official Immunities of Individuals from Criminal Prescription and/or Adjudication -- 3.XI The Standard Model and the "Whose Law . . .?" Questions -- 4. The Territorial Principle -- 4.I Basics and Background -- 4.I.A What Is "Territoriality"? -- 4.I.B What Is the Territory of a State? -- 4.I.B.1 Places "assimilated to state territory".
|
| 505 |
8 |
|
|a 4.I.B.2 Places in which states have limited authority to prescribe criminal law: Treaty and custom -- 4.I.B.3 The place where a hijacked aircraft lands with the hijacker still on board: A special territory? -- 4.I.C "Localization": How States Define which Crimes Are Committed in Their Territories and Who May Be Prosecuted for Them -- 4.I.C.1 "Elements" of crimes and localization of crime -- 4.I.C.2 Intent, other mental states, and territorial jurisdiction -- 4.I.C.3 Legal fictions involved in localization of partly territorial or wholly extraterritorial crime -- 4.I.C.3.a "Constructive presence" -- 4.I.C.3.b "Deeming" partly or wholly extraterritorial crimes to have been committed within a state -- 4.I.C.3.c "Continuing" or "renewed" offenses across borders -- 4.I.C.3.d Fictional "territorial" zones -- 4.I.D Three Basic Patterns of Territoriality Today: Subjective Territoriality, Objective Territoriality, and Ubiquity -- 4.II Justifications of, and Objections to, Territorial Jurisdiction -- 4.II.A Justifications of, and Objections to, Territorial Jurisdiction in General -- 4.II.A.1 Justifications based primarily in international law theory -- 4.II.A.2 Justifications and objections based primarily in criminal law theory -- 4.II.B Justifications of, and Objections to, Subjective Territoriality -- 4.II.B.1 Justifications and objections based primarily in international law -- 4.II.B.2 Justifications and objections based primarily in criminal law -- 4.II.B.2.a Acts by non-nationals on the territory of a state: The philosophical debate -- 4.II.B.2.b Counterargument to unlimited subjective territoriality where the criminal result happens elsewhere: It can criminalize "innocent" results -- 4.II.C Justifications of, and Objections to, Objective Territoriality.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Criminal jurisdiction.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a International crimes.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Transnational crime.
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Criminal jurisdiction
|2 fast
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a International crimes
|2 fast
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Transnational crime
|2 fast
|
| 758 |
|
|
|i has work:
|a Whose law must I obey? (Text)
|1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCFT4Wx6JwqJGpWPwPDVCry
|4 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork
|
| 776 |
0 |
8 |
|i Print version :
|z 9780199941476
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://holycross.idm.oclc.org/login?auth=cas&url=https://academic.oup.com/book/41841
|y Click for online access
|
| 903 |
|
|
|a OUP-SOEBA
|
| 994 |
|
|
|a 92
|b HCD
|