North Carolina, Supreme Court, Raleigh : Everitt (executor) v Lane et al, June 1843 [printed].

The will of Charles Hopton contained numerous bequests, many of them of named slaves. At his death Hopton owed more than [dollars] 10,000, but only one clause in his will directed that any of his property be sold (namely, the slaves Bill, Burwell and Edmund). Everitt, his executor, took the will to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Corporate Author: Adam Matthew Digital (Firm) (digitiser.)
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Series:Slavery, abolition & social justice.
Subjects:
Online Access:Click for online access

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a2200000Mi 4500
001 on1391991691
003 OCoLC
005 20241006213017.0
006 m o d
007 cr ||||||||a||
008 230622s1843 ncu o 000 d eng d
040 |a UKAMD  |b eng  |e rda  |c UKAMD  |d OCLCO 
035 |a (OCoLC)1391991691 
049 |a HCDD 
245 0 0 |a North Carolina, Supreme Court, Raleigh :  |b Everitt (executor) v Lane et al, June 1843 [printed]. 
264 0 |a Raleigh, North Carolina :  |b North Carolina Supreme Court,  |c 1843. 
300 |a 1 online resource. 
336 |a text  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Slavery, abolition & social justice 
520 |a The will of Charles Hopton contained numerous bequests, many of them of named slaves. At his death Hopton owed more than [dollars] 10,000, but only one clause in his will directed that any of his property be sold (namely, the slaves Bill, Burwell and Edmund). Everitt, his executor, took the will to court gain a ruling on how the debts were to be paid; all the legatees maintained that their legacies were specific and so should not be used as funds to cover the payment of the debts before any legacies were conveyed. The court ruled that the bequests to all parties other than Hopton's widow Elizabeth were transparently specific, and so the question remained as to whether the bequests to Elizabeth were specific or general. It was determined that the bequests to Elizabeth were all specific with the exception of that of one year's provisions. Hopton's debts were to be paid first out of the value of this bequest and then, if that proved insufficient, as seemed inevitable, out of all the other bequests pro rata, all of them being of equal specificity. 
535 1 |a North Carolina State Archives 
542 |f Material sourced from the North Carolina State Archives 
650 7 |a Court records  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Slave trade  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Slavery  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Wills  |2 fast 
651 7 |a North Carolina  |z Wayne County  |2 fast 
710 2 |a Adam Matthew Digital (Firm),  |e digitiser. 
710 1 |a North Carolina.  |b Division of Archives and History,  |e owner. 
830 0 |a Slavery, abolition & social justice. 
856 4 0 |u https://holycross.idm.oclc.org/login?auth=cas&url=https://www.slavery.amdigital.co.uk/documents/detail/north-carolina-supreme-court-raleigh-everitt-executor-v-lane-et-al-june-1843/17610334  |y Click for online access 
903 |a AMD-SLAVERYABOLITIONJUSTICE 
994 |a 92  |b HCD