North Carolina, Supreme Court, Raleigh : Gordon v Brown, December 1846.

Sarah Gordon, slave-owner, had several grandchildren by two sons who had died. One grandchild, Nathaniel Gordon, was of age; the others were infants and were looked after by Hamilton Brown, their stepfather and guardian. To provide for her family, she determined to give her infant grandchildren the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Corporate Author: Adam Matthew Digital (Firm) (digitiser.)
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Series:Slavery, abolition & social justice.
Subjects:
Online Access:Click for online access

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a2200000Mi 4500
001 on1391992787
003 OCoLC
005 20240623213015.0
006 m o d
007 cr ||||||||a||
008 230622s1846 ncu o 000 d eng d
040 |a UKAMD  |b eng  |e rda  |c UKAMD  |d OCLCO 
035 |a (OCoLC)1391992787 
049 |a HCDD 
245 0 0 |a North Carolina, Supreme Court, Raleigh :  |b Gordon v Brown, December 1846. 
264 0 |a Raleigh, North Carolina :  |b North Carolina Supreme Court,  |c 1846. 
300 |a 1 online resource. 
336 |a text  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Slavery, abolition & social justice 
520 |a Sarah Gordon, slave-owner, had several grandchildren by two sons who had died. One grandchild, Nathaniel Gordon, was of age; the others were infants and were looked after by Hamilton Brown, their stepfather and guardian. To provide for her family, she determined to give her infant grandchildren the use of her slave Jim during her lifetime and the remainder in him after her death, and to give Nathaniel another slave, Harriett. A deed was made between Sarah, Nathaniel and Brown, with a [dollars] 1,000 penalty provided for, regarding the sale of the slaves, and also taking into account a [dollars] 550 debt owed by Nathaniel Gordon's deceased father to a man for whom Brown was agent. After Sarah Gordon's death, Nathaniel filed this bill against Brown praying that the slaves be delivered to him or their value accounted for, the bill stating that Brown had since sold them for [dollars] 637 and [dollars] 1,000. The defendant, Brown, maintained Sarah Gordon's right to sell the slaves if she so wished. The Supreme Court determined that there was no evidence that Sarah Brown had agreed to the sales of the slaves, and therefore that the plaintiff was entitled to [dollars] 637 for Jim and an assessment of the value of Harriett, and any offspring she might have, with a view to receiving this sum for her. 
535 1 |a North Carolina State Archives 
542 |f Material sourced from the North Carolina State Archives 
650 7 |a Court records  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Slave trade  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Slavery  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Wills  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Enslaved women  |2 fast 
651 7 |a North Carolina  |z Wilkes County  |2 fast 
710 2 |a Adam Matthew Digital (Firm),  |e digitiser. 
710 1 |a North Carolina.  |b Division of Archives and History,  |e owner. 
830 0 |a Slavery, abolition & social justice. 
856 4 0 |u https://holycross.idm.oclc.org/login?auth=cas&url=https://www.slavery.amdigital.co.uk/documents/detail/north-carolina-supreme-court-raleigh-gordon-v-brown-december-1846/2262117  |y Click for online access 
903 |a AMD-SLAVERYABOLITIONJUSTICE 
994 |a 92  |b HCD