North Carolina, Supreme Court, Raleigh : State v Oscar (a slave), December 1859 [printed].

Indictment for an assault upon a white woman with an intent to commit rape. Evidence from Harry, a fellow servant, who first suggested that another person had been responsible, but then gave the solicitor for the State grounds to suspect that he was an accomplice in the assault with Oscar. The priso...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Corporate Author: Adam Matthew Digital (Firm) (digitiser.)
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Series:Slavery, abolition & social justice.
Subjects:
Online Access:Click for online access

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a2200000Mi 4500
001 on1391992980
003 OCoLC
005 20241006213017.0
006 m o d
007 cr ||||||||a||
008 230622s1859 ncu o 000 d eng d
040 |a UKAMD  |b eng  |e rda  |c UKAMD  |d OCLCO 
035 |a (OCoLC)1391992980 
049 |a HCDD 
245 0 0 |a North Carolina, Supreme Court, Raleigh :  |b State v Oscar (a slave), December 1859 [printed]. 
264 0 |a Raleigh, North Carolina :  |b North Carolina Supreme Court,  |c 1859. 
300 |a 1 online resource. 
336 |a text  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Slavery, abolition & social justice 
520 |a Indictment for an assault upon a white woman with an intent to commit rape. Evidence from Harry, a fellow servant, who first suggested that another person had been responsible, but then gave the solicitor for the State grounds to suspect that he was an accomplice in the assault with Oscar. The prisoner was found guilty in the lower court. Counsel for the prisoner alleged that some testimony should have been ruled inadmissible and that improper instructions had been given to the jury. The Supreme Court ruled that although the prisoner and the witness had recently had a fight, it was valid evidence that the two had been seen together the day after the alleged assault conversing in friendly terms. On the second point the Supreme Court did agree that Judge Heath's instructions to the jury on the meaning of the words rational doubt might have misled the jury. On this basis a re-trial was ordered. 
535 1 |a North Carolina State Archives 
542 |f Material sourced from the North Carolina State Archives 
650 7 |a Court records  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Jury  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Sex  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Trials (Assault and battery)  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Violence  |2 fast 
651 7 |a North Carolina  |z Rowan County  |2 fast 
710 2 |a Adam Matthew Digital (Firm),  |e digitiser. 
710 1 |a North Carolina.  |b Division of Archives and History,  |e owner. 
830 0 |a Slavery, abolition & social justice. 
856 4 0 |u https://holycross.idm.oclc.org/login?auth=cas&url=https://www.slavery.amdigital.co.uk/documents/detail/north-carolina-supreme-court-raleigh-state-v-oscar-a-slave-december-1859/17614820  |y Click for online access 
903 |a AMD-SLAVERYABOLITIONJUSTICE 
994 |a 92  |b HCD