North Carolina, Supreme Court, Raleigh : Yarbrough v Arrington et al, December 1848 [printed].

On his marriage to Mary Battle in North Carolina, Thomas Yarbrough received several slaves from her father Frederick. Yarbrough subsequently moved to Arkansas and took the slaves with him. Being considerably indebted and worried about executions, Yarbrough asked Frederick Battle to convey title to t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Corporate Author: Adam Matthew Digital (Firm) (digitiser.)
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Series:Slavery, abolition & social justice.
Subjects:
Online Access:Click for online access

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a2200000Mi 4500
001 on1391994269
003 OCoLC
005 20240623213015.0
006 m o d
007 cr ||||||||a||
008 230622s1848 ncu o 000 d eng d
040 |a UKAMD  |b eng  |e rda  |c UKAMD  |d OCLCO 
035 |a (OCoLC)1391994269 
049 |a HCDD 
245 0 0 |a North Carolina, Supreme Court, Raleigh :  |b Yarbrough v Arrington et al, December 1848 [printed]. 
264 0 |a Raleigh, North Carolina :  |b North Carolina Supreme Court,  |c 1848. 
300 |a 1 online resource. 
336 |a text  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Slavery, abolition & social justice 
520 |a On his marriage to Mary Battle in North Carolina, Thomas Yarbrough received several slaves from her father Frederick. Yarbrough subsequently moved to Arkansas and took the slaves with him. Being considerably indebted and worried about executions, Yarbrough asked Frederick Battle to convey title to the slaves to his and Mary's children rather than to him. Battle conveyed the slaves to the young Frederick and Emily Yarbrough. Thomas Yarbrough gave a bond for [dollars] 1,200 to James Yarbrough, who then endorsed it to the present plaintiff, Richard Yarbrough. Battle subsequently died and Richard Yarbrough brought this bill to levy on some of Frederick Battle's land in North Carolina which had been devised in his will to his daughter Mary Yarbrough. Arrington, Battle's administrator, answered that there were some slaves unsold but that very little of Battle's estate would devolve to the Yarbroughs in Arkansas. The Supreme Court dismissed the bill on the grounds that a ruling for the plaintiffs would unfairly expose Arrington to the potential of further lawsuits if he set foot outside North Carolina. 
535 1 |a North Carolina State Archives 
542 |f Material sourced from the North Carolina State Archives 
650 7 |a Court records  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Debt  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Land use  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Slave trade  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Slavery  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Wills  |2 fast 
651 7 |a North Carolina  |z Nash County  |2 fast 
710 2 |a Adam Matthew Digital (Firm),  |e digitiser. 
710 1 |a North Carolina.  |b Division of Archives and History,  |e owner. 
830 0 |a Slavery, abolition & social justice. 
856 4 0 |u https://holycross.idm.oclc.org/login?auth=cas&url=https://www.slavery.amdigital.co.uk/documents/detail/north-carolina-supreme-court-raleigh-yarbrough-v-arrington-et-al-december-1848/17611255  |y Click for online access 
903 |a AMD-SLAVERYABOLITIONJUSTICE 
994 |a 92  |b HCD