North Carolina, Supreme Court, Raleigh : Green v Allen, June 1853.

It was the duty of every slave-owner residing in the state who had slaves hired out to enlist them for taxation in their own county of residence, rather than in the county where the slaves were hired, if this was different. This was set out by an act of 1846 (chapter 67, section 6). The plaintiff, r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Corporate Author: Adam Matthew Digital (Firm) (digitiser.)
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Series:Slavery, abolition & social justice.
Subjects:
Online Access:Click for online access

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a2200000Mi 4500
001 on1391998016
003 OCoLC
005 20240623213015.0
006 m o d
007 cr ||||||||a||
008 230622s1853 ncu o 000 d eng d
040 |a UKAMD  |b eng  |e rda  |c UKAMD  |d OCLCO 
035 |a (OCoLC)1391998016 
049 |a HCDD 
245 0 0 |a North Carolina, Supreme Court, Raleigh :  |b Green v Allen, June 1853. 
264 0 |a Raleigh, North Carolina :  |b North Carolina Supreme Court,  |c 1853. 
300 |a 1 online resource. 
336 |a text  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Slavery, abolition & social justice 
520 |a It was the duty of every slave-owner residing in the state who had slaves hired out to enlist them for taxation in their own county of residence, rather than in the county where the slaves were hired, if this was different. This was set out by an act of 1846 (chapter 67, section 6). The plaintiff, residing in Craven county, had hired out the slave to Joseph Green, a resident of Brunswick county. He filed to recover damages as the defendant had taken his slave. The defendant was the sheriff of Brunswick. He said that he had distrained the said slave for taxes which he alleged were due upon unlisted property. The slave had not been listed in Brunswick county, but he had been listed in Craven county where his owner lived. The plaintiff contended that this was correct procedure as per the Act of 1846. Judge Dick disagreed and in deference to this the plaintiff filed a nonsuit and appealed to the Supreme Court. Nonsuit set aside. Judgment for the plaintiff. 
535 1 |a North Carolina State Archives 
542 |f Material sourced from the North Carolina State Archives 
650 7 |a Court records  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Jury  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Property  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Sheriffs  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Slaveholders  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Taxation  |2 fast 
651 7 |a North Carolina  |2 fast 
710 2 |a Adam Matthew Digital (Firm),  |e digitiser. 
710 1 |a North Carolina.  |b Division of Archives and History,  |e owner. 
830 0 |a Slavery, abolition & social justice. 
856 4 0 |u https://holycross.idm.oclc.org/login?auth=cas&url=https://www.slavery.amdigital.co.uk/documents/detail/north-carolina-supreme-court-raleigh-green-v-allen-june-1853/2270782  |y Click for online access 
903 |a AMD-SLAVERYABOLITIONJUSTICE 
994 |a 92  |b HCD